Kjell Inge Røkke from AkerBP (left) and Ian H Lundin to the right. AkerBP has bought up Lundin’s assets. The deal will allow the Lundin family control of 15 percent of AkerBP.
December 23rd, 2021 | by Egbert Wesselink

Lundin Energy sells out to AkerBP

AkerBP acquires assets gained from blood money and leaves survivors of war crimes out in the cold

Norway should not clear the AkerBP deal unless the rights of survivors are secured

The Chairman and former CEO of Lundin Energy have been indicted for complicity in grave war crimes committed with the purpose of securing the company’s operations in southern Sudan. The survivors of the crimes were thrown into extreme poverty and are seeking redress. After the sale of its Norwegian assets, Lundin Energy will no longer be able to pay its debt to them.

The Swedish war crimes trial will hugely damage Lundin Energy’s reputation and business prospects. By acquiring Lundin’s assets, AkerBP offers the Lundin family and shareholders an escape as the deal disconnects their wealth from their debt to the survivors of war crimes. Only tiny remainder of Lundin Energy will retain the company’s moral, criminal and human rights liabilities.

The Lundin family and shareholders sidestep their human rights duties

The right to a remedy and reparation for victims of human rights violations is the uncontested cornerstone of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, to which AkerBP and Lundin Energy, as well as Norway and Sweden are committed. What remains of Lundin Energy will be worth approximately MUSD 290. The company claims that it will be capable of carrying all non-Norwegian liabilities, including forfeiture of € 130M in criminal benefits. PAX estimates Lundin’s fair share of the incurred damages at MUSD 500. After the AkerBP acquisition, Lundin Energy will no longer have that money.

The combination of AkerBP and Lundin will be worth MUSD 20.000 and will be jointly owned by Kjell Inge Røkke’s Aker (21.2 per cent), BP (15.9 per cent), the Lundin family trust Nemesia (14.4 per cent), and other AkerBP and Lundin Energy shareholders (48.6 per cent).

Aker and BP unaware of reputational damage

It is no coincidence that the AkerBP deal comes only five weeks after Ian Lundin and Alex Schneiter were formally charged with complicity in war crimes. The indictment made a lengthy trial inevitable, that would expose abundant evidence of Lundin’s direct links with war crimes and put pressure on its shareholders to assume responsibility for this legacy.

AkerBP praises and welcomes Ian Lundin and his brother Lukas and will nominate Ashley Heppenstall as Director. Mr Heppenstall was Lundin’s CEO during the Sudan years. He was a suspect in the war crimes investigation until the Swedish prosecution decided to reduce the number of suspects. Nevertheless, AkerBP states that its association with Lundin will positively impact its reputation. Meanwhile, the business case for the merger between AkerBP and Lundin Energy is weak. According to AkerBP, its added value lies essentially in potential cost cuttings.

The deal is hugely advantageous for the Lundin family and Lundin’s shareholders. The company’s 2020 annual report acknowledges that the war crimes trial comes with substantial reputational and financial risks, including penalties, critical media coverage, and divestments. On top of that comes the risk of becoming an unattractive partner for governments. The merger offers a way out of all that by disconnecting the company’s assets from their allegedly criminal origins. Ian Lundin and Alex Schneiter risk long prison sentences but Lundin’s shareholders will be getting away with two decades of wilful blindness to war crimes.

Will Norway stand up for war crimes survivors?

Not all is lost for the tens of thousands of survivors of war crimes. The AkerBP deal requires clearance from the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and the Norwegian Ministry of Finance. The core provision of the UNGPs is that companies must address their adverse human rights impacts. Stripped from its Norwegian assets, Lundin Energy will no longer be able to fulfil this duty. Unconditional clearance will therefore bring perpetual denial of the rights of survivors. To stay loyal to itself, the Norwegian Government should not allow this to happen. Norway should express support for the rights of victims of human rights violations, commission an independent assessment of Lundin’s adverse human rights impacts in Sudan, and ensure that Lundin Energy reserves ample funds to pay its debts to survivors of war crimes.

Comments are closed.

Back to Top ↑
  • Latest news

  • Fuel fot conflict
  • Unpaid Debt report